|
I was drawn in straight away and could not stop reading this compelling story of Frankenstein and his creation of the monster who was so pituful and so horrible at the same time. This is a true classic novel in every sense. I also recommend Complete Vampire Chronicles (Interview with the Vampire, The Vampire Lestat, The Queen of the Damned, The Tale of the body Thief). A must, must read. You have the good vs. evil and the question of how far can science take us.
Would Mary Shelley approve of Matt Allen's version of her text. Matt Allen - with the surgical precision of a cardiologist - galvanizes our interest in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, breathing new life into its barely beating heart with the scalpel of the crude. Much like her protagonist, Victor Frankenstein, she did not know what havoc she would unleash with her creation, what social mores upended, what ideas rethought, what literary trends rebuked. A memorable lesson: when we finish creating our work, we become powerless; our creations have their own journeys of which we are no longer a part. Does it matter. But for how much longer.
"F***ing Frankenstein" is the way to go, by far. He released a monster. This is not sedition; this is galvanism. Much like Mary Shelley's subtextual warnings of the evil of the industrial revolution, Matt Allen, in his profane Frankenstein, exposes the same dangers of the information age. Frankenstein has a long history of subversion and what Matt Allen demonstrates here is a coy understanding of Frankenstein's true scholarly tradition. And so too did Mary Shelley - with Frankenstein, a monster of literary endurance, living on for almost two centuries. Don't take my word for it, take Jonathan L. Davis's word.
For what is Frankenstein if not immortal, shifting, complex. To dismiss Allen's placement of profanity into the novel as "blasphemy" or "sacrilege" is to miss the point. "Galvanism" is the term Victor Frankenstein used to describe his scientific method when reanimating life. While old Manchester coal mines sooted up the streets with black and phlegm, digital media perverts the literary landscape with cut/paste and search/replace. What Matt Allen has done here is revolutionary.
To read "F***ing Frankenstein" is to read the real Frankenstein - a modern Prometheus, as Mary Shelley so artfully describes. She created a monster. Matt Allen may not be the last to put his learned fingerprints on a literary classic, but he may be our most canny academe. In 1831, Mary Shelley created a monster when she published Frankenstein. In 1831, critics denounced Mary Shelley's Frankenstein as a "horrible and disgusting absurdity" (Quarterly Review).
He inserted the word "f***" and its gerund "f***ing" into the text. Victor Frankenstein imbued life into something inanimate. Enter writer Matt Allen.
It is secrecy that eats up Frankenstein, and holds him hostage to help his fellow man.The Pocket Book publishers had it right. The themes are abundant and the ideas suggested, and bluntly stated, are sprinkled throughout. Frankenstein. With this in mind, Frankenstein is a book intended to create fear and engender greater moral responsibility to the science community and those who regulate it. It seems Shelley would have the individual creator weigh the pros and the cons. Shelley devotes several chapters to the questioning of the creator by the created, and develops a rich dialogue between the two men.In the first chapter of the second volume, the monster lectures Frankenstein that Frankenstein's neglect of him was wrong, and that the bond between them can only be broken with one of their deaths. The secrecy theme is also relevant. Shelley gives an answer to all three questions through the eyes of her main characters Victor Frankenstein and his "monster." Immediately with Frankenstein's freakish human creation, the reader is quickly alerted to the wrongness of it.
The creature surely resembled a man, yet his appearance in sighted so much terror that it is hard to grapple with the idea that he truly was a man because of his peculiar origins and the evil that he soon would embark on. However, Shelley gives light to the reader on why the monster spreads terror throughout Frankenstein's circle of family and friends, thus rendering him human, and the reason cited is neglect. When has science gone too far. this book serves as a strong caution.monsters may yet be created, and they may not be a work wrought just by medical doctors and scientists, but rather they could become the monsters themselves.No matter which side one may come down on the issues of today, there is one thing that no one can dispute -- Mary Shelley, a woman who lived in the 19th century wrote a marvelous book that seems to become more relevant as time progresses. The monster learned how to talk, and learned social interactions in that he learned what a mother was, etc. What is the responsibility of a creator to a creation. Well, interestingly Shelley seems to indicate that life is not something for the scientist to meddle in.
Frankenstein refuses to tell authorities in the beginning about the monster, because he believes they will think him insane. A Review of Mary Shelley's FrankensteinWhen has science gone too far. The reader is left with two decisions - is the creature a man or is it a monster. Of course it is too late then, and his initial instincts were right, in that the people he tells, other than Robert Walton, do think he is crazy. Another theme is feminism and motherhood, because the publishers believe that this book provides an insight to a female mind, and gives a feminine interpretation of a gothic novel. The monstrosity is what raises a question about responsibility to the creation, because it is undetermined whether the creation is a monster or human - if he is a monster then kill it or if human then help it.
It seems that is left ultimately up to the reader to resolve, but many passages lead one to determine that Frankenstein had a great responsibility for the creature and those around him. The last part of the book is about Frankenstein unrelentingly pursuing the monster after he finally makes the good decision not to make a female monster. Frankenstein is shocked by the creature he created, and because of his selfishness, cowardice, and lack of compassion, Frankenstein's creature becomes a monster. It is a tale of people trying to achieve knowledge they should not.
The first they state is science versus nature. A woman living in the times of Dr. Shelley penned the words of Frankenstein in an era that was beginning to boom with the modern interpretation of science, will always be remembered for her masterful work of art. However, this is not done because Frankenstein was rash, and it then fell to him to destroy the work his hands had made. It most assuredly will continue to endure the test of time and will be a blessing to provide a conscience for modern science or a haunting reminder of what man was able to do, but shouldn't have.Work CitedShelley, Mary.
The book also gives warning to those who are ambitious and those who have great talent to be careful, because oftentimes those attributes can lead to disaster as was so tragically seen by Frankenstein. This book surely is about science versus nature -- it is the same theme presented in this paper that asks when has science gone too far. The secrecy was so powerful that it ate at Frankenstein, and in a way, the tale was told because it was his last way to release the agony of keeping the secret.Shelley's Frankenstein explores so many areas. Darwin, who contemplated his ideas and was challenged by her two friends and husband, wrote a novel that has invoked fear into many millions of readers. Truly, this overarching theme is in play from the creation of the monster, to the havoc and blood shed wreaked by the monster, to Frankenstein's contemplation to appease the creature by creating another, to finally his pursuit of the demon. Now comes in to play the question of the responsibility of a creator over his or her creation. The monster had raised himself; he learned language and social skills by observing others, as well as the necessities of survival. However, Robert Walton sees the creature himself at the end, so if he had any doubt it was displaced by sight.
The inhabitants of the cottage home that he observed became his unknowing teachers. The second to last theme cited is "monstrosity." "The issue of what is a monster lies at the heart of the novel." This main theme, according to the publishers, is what haunts the book through and through. genetic engineering) this book will continue to fascinate. They explain that "there are some things man is not meant to know (Pocket Books)." It goes on to state that there is a struggle between what is natural and what is interference by man. It is argued here that gothic tales are typically a male oriented type of writing, yet the most famous of gothic tales is by a woman. The monstrosity is what keeps the reader reading.
The shock and horror felt by Frankenstein at his creature sets up the moral struggle that was so evidently in the mind of Shelley. The question presented here is just a more blunt and simple form of the complex discussion of science versus nature. So it is also interesting that she was only 18 years old when she created this story, but surely none of these were factors that led to the book's success, rather it was the talent and dedication of Mary Shelley, the person.The monstrosity and secrecy themes are extremely relevant. This even prompted a naturally human response -- kindness. Challenges that become more and more relevant each day with the world of changing technology. What constitutes life and when is it society's responsibility to take it, nurture it, or create it. With our modern age full of amazing scientific discovery and meddling with the laws of nature (e.g. It seems that Shelley is asserting that life is sacred, and developing it can be dangerous.
the most important of all should be the resounding theme of the sanctity of life. The problem was that he catered to one individual in a foolish manner, and lost both because of his fear of the monster.When should one refrain from experimenting. This tale is a great one because Mary Shelley was a brilliant and gifted writer -- just as many other women are as well as many men. This book is a token of her greatness as an author, but this novel's greatness has nothing to do with feminine themes or motherhood. The questions go on and on.
There seems to be nothing classically feminine about this tale, nor does it have anything to do with motherhood directly. The creature took care of the people in the house, cutting down wood for them and doing other outdoor chores. What is man. The deaths of Justine, Elizabeth, and Clerval are terrible and gut wrenching, yet so is the pain of the monster and Frankenstein. Parts of this dilemma are briefly touched on in this paper, but are these links correct. In regards to what constitutes a man -- it is a more philosophical question - this question is addressed clearly in the conversation between Frankenstein and his monster. NY: Pocket Books, 2004. These questions are resonant themes as well as questions that are presented throughout the book.
He keeps all this to himself until he has lost everyone important to him. The horrors of the monster bring evils upon everyone that is even remotely connected to the monster. The order of the world is set off balance because of Frankenstein's creature in Shelley's book, and this is because science was not appropriated correctly, but was instead used selfishly which ultimately resulted in lethal consequences.In the portion of the book where the creature recounts his two years before meeting up with Frankenstein, there was a narrative of how he survived. These questions are pondered and even given answers in Frankenstein. It may be an interesting side note though, that at the time it was written very few women or mothers wrote books. In her preface she mentions that the actuality of a creature being given life is not an impossibility according to Darwin and some physiological German writers.
And then the next emphasis -- what is the creator's (Frankenstein's) responsibility to his creature, the monster. The monstrosity theme is linked to the other two questions presented in this paper -- what is man and what is the responsibility of the creator to the creation. When should society enact ethics laws to block some science. Readers have been, and will continue to be challenged by this work.
It is ultimately unimportant, and probably was for Shelley too, whether or not man could really ever create life in the way Frankenstein did, but it is the maddening pursuit, the gross abandonment of morality and blinding terror of disorder that punctuates this story. The publishers argue that it is both Frankenstein and Robert Walton that are acting unnatural by trying to create life, but end up in fact destroying life.The idea of feminism and motherhood really has little to do with this tale. Shelley portrays this terrible dilemma for the monster that longs for human interaction, but because his looks are extremely frightening he is forced into isolation. At moments the story sets up an emotional conflict that has you feeling sympathy for the monster, and yet at once also feeling fearful and disgusted by the monster's actions.
In an age that is wrestling with questions of science and morality such as embryonic research, abortion, life support, gender change surgery. The monster had emotions and feelings, and though he was horribly deformed and a frightful looking creature, he was most assuredly human -- not because his physical members were collections of dead human corpses, but because he demonstrated that he could learn, communicate through language, and reason. Only then does he finally start telling people. And the last theme is that of secrecy, because, of course, secrecy has a lot to do with the demise of the characters in the book.
Frankenstein, though with noble intentions, created and then abandoned his creation from fear, and it was from this act of abandonment that the monster blamed for his behavior. Thus the lesson taught by Shelley's gothic horror reaches its final conclusion to eradicate a horrible mistake.In the Pocket Books publication of Frankenstein, it puts forward several themes that the publishers believe are the main motifs of the book.
I guess it's my own oversight, but now I have to reorder the original unabridged version. I began reading this version of the book along with an audio book and realized that it had altered and missing passages.
Although an early innovator in the horror and sci-fi genres, "Frankenstein" still remains a seminal piece of simple romanticism. "Frankenstein" contains the most effortlessly beautiful language to ever be penned. The relationship between Victor Frankenstein and his monster portrays every emotion a human will encounter in life. Despite being murderous and physically appalling, it's easy to identify with the monster's alienation and despair, which is deepened through Shelley's touching poetics and prose.
|
